1. Home
  2. Gadgets

There’s Nothing “Pro” About the iPad Pro

There’s nothing “professional” about the new iPad pro. It’s big, it’s pretty, it even supports a cool new stylus. At the end of the day, it’s still just an iPad, and that makes it a fundamentally limited device that should not appeal to creative professionals. Like every iPad that came before it, there are things that the iPad pro just cannot do:

  • The iPad Pro does not support desktop-class imaging, audio and video applications
  • The iPad Pro does not support non-proprietary hardware connections, preventing file transfer and accessory devices
  • The iPad Pro does not support certain kinds of media files that are necessary to creative professionals

Before digging in to these limitations, there are many things an iPad can offer to creative professionals. As a working commercial photographer and filmmaker, I use iPads on set almost daily. I use a WiFi connected iPad to trigger my DSLR in commercial architecture and food shoots. I’ve used an iPad as a mobile softbox to illuminate a subject in a dark location (I lit this shot with an iPad and an iPad Mini). Each of these examples aren’t unique to an iPad, however, as I’ve used my mobile phone to trigger my DSLR and any tablet can double as a light source. If the iPad Pro offers anything for me as a photographer, it’s a slightly larger light source. Everything else it offers is no different from my current iPad Air 2.

iPad Pro 2 600x603 Theres Nothing Pro About the iPad Pro

The iPad Pro Does Not Offer Desktop Class Creative Software

Just like the iPad Air 2, the iPad Pro does not support desktop class creative software. It uses a mobile OS, not a desktop system like a laptop or even a competing product like the Microsoft Surface Pro. A user cannot install the full version of Adobe Photoshop for comprehensive image editing. On a desktop, I can edit 30-layer image composites. On an iPad, a user is a limited to a watered-down mobile version of that software.

For the iPad Pro to truly be a professional device, it should support professional creative applications like Photoshop, Premiere and otherwise.

iPad Pro 5 600x194 Theres Nothing Pro About the iPad Pro

The iPad Pro Does Not Support USB Devices

A lack of support for USB devices has been a common criticism with the iPad for some time. As a multi-generation iPad owner, this has never presented much of a problem for me. My uses for an iPad and my professional imaging work haven’t intersected. I haven’t needed to transfer files to my iPad, I’ve had no reason for a wired connection to my DSLR.

If the iPad Pro is designed for creative professionals, however, the lack of such connectivity is a pressing concern. Even if the iPad Pro were to support desktop-class creative software, transferring files to edit would be a needlessly complicated process. If I can’t connect my DSLR directly to an iPad Pro like I could with a Macbook Air, the “pro” moniker just doesn’t fit.

iPad Pro 3

The iPad Pro Doesn’t Provide Open Support of Certain File Types

Even if you could transfer files to your iPad Pro from another device, some just won’t be supported. If you’ve tried to export H.264 files in certain formats from Premiere, then transfer them via Dropbox to an iPad Air, you’ll have seen file format errors in the past. Sure, there are apps that will allow you to view (and process) RAW files, and others that will allow you to play files that aren’t supported right out of the gate. But complete, open file support is necessary for many creative professionals. We shouldn’t need to look for work-arounds, we should expect immediate, flawless support of the complicated formats we’re used to dealing with.

iPad Pro 8

Coincidentally, there is a tablet with the “pro” moniker which does all of these things, and has done them for quite some time. The Microsoft Surface Pro supports desktop class creative software, it can connect directly to a DSLR or other device, and it’s flexible with file formats. As a long-time iPad user, I’ve never considered an Android or Windows tablet. The thought has never crossed my mind.

Until now, that is. Apple just revealed a product that is implied to be for “professionals”, but it falls so far short of that. The thing is, I like the idea of having a tablet that does all of the things I can do on a desktop. The idea of working with a stylus and processing files from the work day sounds exciting to me. If the Apple iPad Pro’s launch has done anything for me, it’s made me seriously consider switching to a Windows tablet.

Oh, the irony.

iPad Pro | Gallery

Liked our story? Share it with friends

What do you think?

  • It seems like Apple could hit a home run by making some sort of hybrid of an iPad and MacBook Pro. Bring the touch-friendly elements of iOS to OS X, and bam, creative-minded people all over the world will be interested.

  • Phillip E. Payne

    Since I have an iPad Air, the new iPad Pro is most intriguing. However, I concur with this assessment of Apple falling short of what the new iPad Pro must offer to validate spending money for it. Sorry, Apple, you’ve failed. Instead I’ll look to Microsoft since it can support Adobe, and other software, I have learned are necessary for professional results.

  • REFLEXRED

    its basically a microsoft surface without all the “pro” stuff a surface has lol. waste of money.

  • bestshingles

    (SARCASM WARNING) Don’t read this if you love Apples.
    Yes, if they just copy Microsofts move to a combined OS for tablet phone and desktop, with mouse and attachment interfaces, desktop program support and robust peripheral management as well as touch and mobility, then they will have a serious competitor (pronounced “clone”) of Microsofts devices and OS.
    Way to innovate Apple!
    Just like their move to larger phone screens.
    After years of complaining.
    How are they successful?
    Oh, right, the fanatical egocentric apple fan boys.
    They must be really butt-hurt over all this apple sauce, sorry.
    They really can’t win now, if they don’t follow MS move they’re not making devices people need, if they do follow, we’ll, they’re following, not leading.
    I guess all they can do is what they’ve always done, then. Copy others innovations and portend like the others were actually copying them, in their universe where time runs backwards.