1. Home
  2. Offbeat

12 Safest Places To Go During Nuclear War

Back in the 80’s Matthew Broderick could teach a computer that global thermonuclear war brought about no more winners than you would get playing tic-tac-toe, a game notorious for ties. While humans are allegedly smarter than machines, some people who have their finger on a giant red button that could annihilate all life on the planet for a few million years still haven’t played enough tic-tac-toe to get the message. Though the international arms race may be over and the days of ducking and covering when we see a mushroom cloud are long behind us, the threat remains that a madman could start a global holocaust. Which means you should know where to go should the big boom take place.

Determining Where Is Safe

Due to the extensive nuclear arsenals that were amassed by the United States and the former Soviet Union, as well as many other industrialized nations to varying degrees, the estimated destructive capacity of current nuclear weapons on the planet is sufficient to obliterate life on Earth many times over. Luckily, moves toward disarmament as well as time, budget, and changes in leadership have largely reduced the number of active and operational nuclear arms to a slightly more manageable level of wanton destruction. Further, the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) established in 1987 severely restricts the spread of the weapons along with the information and technology used to build them. This too has altered the nuclear landscape.

Using this data, as well as blast radius and fallout information for the bombs, along with weather patterns and the current global climate, both governmental agencies as well as private organizations run computer drills and simulations to determine the most likely course a nuclear war might take. These projections add in millions of variables, run through various launch scenarios, and attempt to ascertain valuable targets so as to determine where strikes are most likely to occur. It is through the results of these simulations that the scientific community has gathered information about the safest – and the most deadly – places in the world, should the bombs drop in spite of Bob Dylan’s urging to “Go away you bombs.”


via undergroundbombshelter.com

The uber-wealthy tend to prefer this strategem, since it allows them to keep their shelter close to home without requiring travel during a time when, presumably, multiple nations are trying to wipe out everything that walks or crawls. Like the days of the Cuban missile crisis, digging a deep hole and filling it with concrete is likely the best way to assure that you can actually get to your safety. Here, the deeper you go and the thicker you pour your concrete, the better. Maybe some lead lining wouldn’t hurt, either. Tiny House Design has some suggestions if you’re thinking of building your own nuclear fallout bunker.

The issue with digging down is if you do live in a high-risk area, you could still be looking at a lifetime spent as a mole person, assuming you managed to get down far enough to avoid radiation. You’ll only have about 10 to 15 minutes between when the bombs hit (if you’re anywhere near ground zero, you won’t have time to do anything) and when the radiation reaches you. Keep your mouth open if you see an explosion to keep your eardrums intact and RUN to your shelter. Then you have to think about contaminated groundwater and food supplies. Really, you’re better off moving somewhere that the nukes aren’t likely to find.

WWIII Helpful Hint! Head to the southern hemisphere. There’s fewer valuable targets, fewer major, industrial nations, and fewer nuclear weapons.


via go-today.com

The small, sparsely populated nation of Iceland is largely divorced both from most major international politics and from physical contact with another country. The combination of physical isolation, neutrality on the governmental stage, and an inhospitable climate make it a tremendous place to stay safe from nuclear issues.

New Zealand

via gadventures.com

New Zealand is a lovely agricultural country that feels like a small town, no matter where you go. Bearing no nuclear arms themselves, having almost no military, lots of space to spread out, and being far from everywhere except Australia, this even has a warm, enjoyable climate to spend your end of days in comfort.


via thedailychronic.net

Countries that have long been major bases for the United States military typically rank high on the list of Places Nuclear Bombs Will Destroy. In the case of Guam, the fact is that no one really wants it. It’s a nice land, but backwards and isolated, with few resources and no threat to anyone.


via naturalworldsafaris.com

An obvious choice, it’s a good place to avoid bombs, but a terrible place to live. You’re going to need to pack enough supplies, because you aren’t living off that land, and you’d better pray the nuclear apocalypse happens during summer in the southern hemisphere.

French Polynesia

via taxfreehaven.info

More than 400 islands, French Polynesia is too scattered to really warrant an attack, and far enough from any shore that the water should sink nuclear fallout before it drifts in on the tradewinds. Also very pretty and sustainable.

Perth, Australia

via paradiseintheworld.com

Australia’s eastern coast is likely to suffer, since there’s seats of government, major cities, and political players on a global level. On the west side, there’s desert. Then, there’s Perth. While there’s other cities that might work, Perth is place away from anything else, so should someone get trigger happy and start hitting anything that looks viable, it’s deep under the radar.

South Africa

via export.gov

Though Apartheid may have caused many to stir against South Africa, the nation doesn’t otherwise bear many international political problems, has solid infrastructure from English occupation, and isn’t a threat to anyone. As a bonus, English is commonly spoken there, the people tend to be very welcoming, and it’s buried almost all of its backward racism, which is more than most parts of the United States can say.


via bakermckenzie.com

There’s a reason Nazi war criminals fled here. It’s the end of the line in many ways and is so full of its own issues that the rest of the world doesn’t care enough to exploit it, much less nuke it. Forgettable and semi-tropical.


via denveryoungprofessionals.com

Instead of going out to get away from the blast, living in the mile high city means you’re going up to save yourself. Though nearby Cheyenne Mountain is a major target, thanks to the NORAD installation, Denver itself is not. Being up where the air is thin reduces the ability of fallout to travel, and being close to a target, but not a target itself allows Denver to remain blissfully forgotten. A bit of a gamble, the proximity to NORAD is actually helpful since there’s few places the government works harder to protect from all attacks.

Kansas City

via breakoutkc.com

Or you could just take your own life. Six of one…


via pinterest.com

While the dense forests and lush wildlands help diffuse any nuclear fallout, you’re also going to be coping with extremely limited infrastructure and plenty of bears who are happy to kill you without any fancy codes or red phones. Plus moose, which are far meaner than any bear. They’re mothers-in-law with antlers.

  1. Denver itself is a major target! The Federal Center is the largest site of government control as a backup to Washington DC. Proximity to Cheyenne Mountain and Warren AFB in Wyoming…. Known to house Nuke weapons. Additionally, just Northeast of Denver sits large tracts of Nuclear missile silos. Sorry, Denver is going to fry.

  2. I kind of agree with you. “Surviving” is all we would be doing and where’s the point, if you’re not living and enjoying life! It would be such a miserable existence. You’d be wandering around looking for food and shelter, developing radiation poisoning, not forgetting that people would form gangs and go around attacking others for their food supplies etc. I really don’t think I’d manage to stay alive for long. I’m not tough enough, so I think it would be best to get wiped out in the initial conflict.

  3. Curious about why Kansas City is not a viable Target. You seem to think that it would be a terrible place to live. If you are talking about Kansas City Missouri, I would go there just for the Chiefs and the ribs. Actually I believe Kansas City is one of the places that is recruiting people to come and work

  4. If things get bad enough in this world that we resort to nuclear attacks and our country his hit, I will not seek shelter. I am not a suicidal person but I’ve always said, “If I had a catastrophic illness or there was a nuclear war that hit our country, my pill arsenal is my go to.” Lots of blood pressure medicine stocked which would be a simply and permanent fix.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *